Leadership Analytics
That Actually Matter

Move beyond traditional metrics. Analyze leadership teams through individual executive performance, team complementarity, and proven track records.

Individual-First Scoring

Transparent leadership assessment based on entrepreneurial success, industry expertise, and execution track record.

Team Dynamics

Analyze functional coverage, experience balance, and background diversity to predict team effectiveness.

Performance Correlation

Compare leadership quality with stock performance and financial metrics across time periods.

Select companies below to start comparing leadership teams
Live data from 10 major companies

Leadership Quality Score

Comprehensive assessment of management team effectiveness (0-100 scale)

Leadership quality rates a management team on a 0-100 scale that blends entrepreneurial pedigree, domain expertise, complementary C-suite skills, consistent execution, adaptability, and insider equity alignment. Scores near 100 signify founder-caliber teams that repeatedly deliver strategy and shareholder value, while scores below 60 flag execution or alignment risk. For investors, this metric helps explain valuation gaps that pure financials miss: higher-quality teams consistently command premium P/E multiples and show greater resilience in downturns. Incorporating leadership quality into screening and pricing adds a forward-looking edge to traditional fundamental analysis.

Social Score

Measure of business leader's external influence and network reach (0-100 scale)

Social score measures a business leader's external influence—spanning institutional roles, media visibility, thought-leadership reach, elite network connections, and public trust—on a 0-100 scale. A higher score indicates executives who shape policy, attract partnerships, and command goodwill, giving their firms privileged access to regulators, talent, and crisis support. For investors, strong social capital often translates into valuation premiums and softer downside risk because influential leadership can secure favorable rules, faster approvals, and positive brand perception. Integrating social-capital scores alongside financial metrics helps explain why otherwise similar companies trade at different multiples and pinpoints firms with latent strategic advantages.

Sort by:
View:
CompanySectorLeadership ScoreSocial ScoreP/E RatioPrice Change (2020-2025)P/E Change % (2020-2025)Actions
Financial Services
71.1Very Good
64.3Good
13.05x+111.2%+30.5%
Financial Services
70.3Very Good
63.4Good
14.25x+249.9%+42.5%
Technology
70.0Very Good
46.5Above Average
49.38x+1073.8%+97.5%
Technology
63.6Good
68.0Very Good
32.43x+56.6%+29.7%
Technology
60.2Good
58.3Good
38.02x+121.2%+52.1%
Consumer Cyclical
54.2Above Average
41.0Average
35.96x+35.4%+99.8%
Communication Services
54.1Above Average
63.2Good
28.05x+163.3%+27.5%
Financial Services
50.8Above Average
42.5Average
16.4x+167.9%+64.0%
Financial Services
42.4Average
32.1Below Average
14.38x+58.9%+43.8%
Financial Services
35.0Average
34.6Below Average
14.64x+170.0%+46.4%